Persuasive Essay Against Gay Marriage

The Top 1. 0 Arguments Against Gay Marriage: All Receive Failing Grades! Both in the U. S. A. Accordingly, more and more people are starting to acknowledge the flawed nature of all arguments which oppose the legalization of same- sex marriage. This article discusses 1.

1. Gay Marriage Quotes from BrainyQuote, an extensive collection of quotations by famous authors, celebrities, and newsmakers.
2. 101 Persuasive Essay Topics. Whether you are a student in need of a persuasive essay topic, or a teacher looking to assign a persuasive essay, this.
3. I liked it and I ended up getting an A on it, so I thought I’d post it here.

In reality, marriage is a societal institution. The natural world didn't create marriage, humans did. Nature- themed arguments against gay marriage say little about the societal institution of marriage but reveal a lot about the homophobia and heterosexism of those who present such arguments. In this regard, the disapproval isn't about gay marriage per se - - it's more about discomfort with homosexuality, period. They reason that because two people of the same sex cannot procreate that they should not be allowed to marry. While the production of children may indeed be a feature of many heterosexual marriages the capacity to procreate does not determine the legal validity of such marriages. There are many married straight couples who cannot biologically have children or who choose not to.

The procreation argument ignores the fact that people marry for a wide range of reasons unrelated to procreation including love, friendship and companionship. References to the Bible, the . Marriage is a religious institution, they argue, and not one for society to tamper with. In order to legally marry there is absolutely no requirement for a religious ceremony to be held.

In this sense, marriage is not a religious institution but a socio- legal one governed by the state. Religious beliefs about marriage should never be enshrined in laws in ways that restrict the freedom of others who do not share those beliefs. They say that efforts to legalize same- sex marriage will fundamentally alter the institution for the worse. History reveals, however, that marriage laws in the U. S. A. There was a time when women were the legal property of their husbands. There was a time when a man and a woman of different races couldn't marry each other.

Just like all lore, there are baby names myths and legends that have been perpetuated in our society. Surely you or someone who knows someone who went to school with. Rich Stearns is a servant, a Wharton grad who leapt from the top of corporate America and landed in a stream, knees bent bracing. Arms outstretched, he is a fisher of.

Search by paper topic, essay type, or simply enter in your assignment to view matches from our massive essay database. Introduction The issues of marriage are very complex, especially when dealing with issues of who should and should not be married, and what being.

There was even a time when not one country in the world had legalized same- sex marriage! Removing discrimination from the institution of marriage does not redefine .

Allowing same- sex couples to marry apparently poses a . If those who use the . They do neither of these things.

The only married straight couples impacted by the legalization of gay marriage are those in which one of the parties is a closet- case gay person who dreams of coming out and marrying someone of the same sex! There is no evidence that children are psychologically harmed by having two dads or two moms. The American Psychological Association (APA), the American Sociological Association (ASA), and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has each endorsed the legalization of same- sex marriage and its capacity to provide a stable familial framework for children.

Reverse Discrimination: . They talk of charity- based religious organizations being . In this reverse scenario, gay people are apparently . Does The End Justify The Means Essay Outline. How dare we demand equal rights and criticize those who discriminate against us!

In no state of the U. S. A. Religious groups and churches are still free to pick and choose who they will and won't marry.

Organizations that receive public money, however, and which must adhere to anti- discrimination laws, should rightly be challenged if they engage in discrimination against a protected class of people. People who present these scenarios portray a catastrophic future with society crumbling under the weight of rampant immorality and social discord. Efforts to legalize same- sex marriage, however, simply aim to provide same- sex couples with equal access to marriage laws - - there is no intention to change the fundamental definition of marriage as the legal union between two adult human beings who have no direct biological connection with each other. Facts are useful in this regard: of the fifteen countries and 1. U. S. Various countries and American states which initially permitted .

These jurisdictions have pursued such changes because civil union legislation, no matter how valiant the effort, is not able to provide the same rights and benefits as legal marriage. In essence, having a two- class system continues to maintain the erroneous notion that one group (straight people) is more superior to another group (LGBT people). Ironically, most advocates of this argument also support the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), a law which allows the federal government to deny more than one thousand federal rights and benefits to same- sex couples legally married at the state level. The maintenance of a system which allows some states to recognize same- sex marriage and others not to, and which allows the federal government to ignore legal same- sex marriages performed at the state level, sets up a cumbersome and extremely complicated national map of unequal rights and legal nightmares. There is no logical or reasonable basis for denying same- sex couples access to secular marriage laws. Opposing the inevitable (marriage equality) is a waste of time, money and energy.

I urge all of those who oppose gay marriage to start focusing on their own lives, to accept that they don't need to marry a person of the same sex, and to recognize the right of all Americans to be treated equally under the law: . Thank you to those at the GMUSA facebook page who have regularly shared their views on this topic and who have, in that regard, helped contribute to the ideas and arguments expressed in this article. Buy Uk Itunes Gift Card on this page. Photos by Murray Lipp.).

Original Work: Persuasive Speech/Essay for Same- Sex Marriage. A/N: A persuasive essay that I did for my Grade 8 Language Arts class. How To Write A Scholarship Essay Examples.

I liked it and I ended up getting an A on it, so I thought I’d post it here. Constructive criticism is appreciated! Homophobic bigotry, however, is not. You’re completely in love and you want to get married.

You’re not allowed to. You are also denied the legal rights that come along with marriage. If your partner gets sick with a terminal illness, you may no be allowed to visit them in the hospital because you are not their spouse.

If they die from that illness, all their worldly possessions could go to a distant cousin because you aren’t married, even though you two were partners in almost every other way. Unfortunately, these are some of the hardships that gay and lesbian couples face everyday.

And, the sad thing is most of the arguments keeping same- sex marriage are flawed and reactionary and are based upon nothing more than prejudice, ignorance, bigotry and fear. Same- sex marriage should be legalized because lesbian and gay couples are good parents, becuase homosexuality is a common occurrence in nature, and becuase the laws keeping same sex- marriage from being legalized are old and outdated. Those against gay and lesbian marriages often use the argument that homosexual couples are unfit parents and cannot produce a child without help from a 3rd party. So, therefore, they should not be allowed to marry, since the sole reason for a marriage is to produce a child. You will see that the arguer has already contradicted themselves.

If the main reason for  a marriage is to produce a child, then why are sterile couples allowed to marry? And why does the arguer call gays and lesbians ?

A study done by the AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics, shows that children raised in homes with two parents of the same- sex develop just as normally as their peers. Also, research done by Nanette Gartrell (a professor of psychiatry at the University of California) and Henry Bos (a behavioral scientist at the University of Amsterdam)  showed that children with lesbian parents may be doing even better than their peers. On average, children raised in lesbian homes had higher grades, more self- esteem, and were less likely to develop behavioral problems. Another commonly used argument is that homosexuality is unnatural and that, by accepting same- sex marriage, we are encouraging an . Two gay chinstrap penguins a the Central Park Zoo are living, breathing proof that their argument is false. Their names are Roy and Silo and they have been . Zookeepers have have tried offering them female companionship, but they adamantly refused it.

It’s a similar story at the Jerusalem Zoo, where two gay griffin vultures, Dashik and Yehuda, are fathering a surrogate chick together. Homosexuality in animals isn’t just something that occurs in zoos, either. Writing High School Essays. According to zoologist Petter Bockman, roughly 1,5. The last of the top three arguments is that same- sex partnerships are short- lived and non- monogamous, therefore, gays and lesbians should not be allowed to marry. This argument is so outdated it’s almost laughable. It may have had some credibility, say, 5. But, nowadays, over half of heterosexual marriages end in divorce.

Nowadays, 5. 7% of men and 5. Argument Essay Topics For College Students here. Marriage is no longer what it was fifty years ago. There are many other arguments against gay marriage, each as refutable as the rest. If no convincing arguments can be made, and all that is stopping two people from legally spending the rest of their lives together is the prejudice and ignorance of people who refuse to listen to the facts, why are people who love eachother not allowed to be married? Discrimination and hatred are wrong.

Love knows no boundaries. Love does not care if the two people are different races. Love does not care if the two people are the same gender. Love does not care how different people’s social background is.

Love is blind to differences and similarities. There is only one truth that people should never forget: Love is love.

Essay Writing Service - Essay. Erudite. com. We value excellent academic writing and strive to provide outstanding essay writing services each and every time you place an order. We write essays, research papers, term papers, course works, reviews, theses and more, so our primary mission is to help you succeed academically. Most of all, we are proud of our dedicated team, who has both the creativity and understanding of our clients' needs. Our writers always follow your instructions and bring fresh ideas to the table, which remains a huge part of success in writing an essay. We guarantee the authenticity of your paper, whether it's an essay or a dissertation.

Furthermore, we ensure confidentiality of your personal information, so the chance that someone will find out about our cooperation is slim to none. We do not share any of your information to anyone. Our Services. When it comes to essay writing, an in- depth research is a big deal. Our experienced writers are professional in many fields of knowledge so that they can assist you with virtually any academic task.

We deliver papers of different types: essays, theses, book reviews, case studies, etc. When delegating your work to one of our writers, you can be sure that we will: Use your writing style; Follow your guidelines; Make all the needed corrections whenever it’s necessary; Meet even the strictest deadlines; Provide you with a free title page and bibliography. We have thousands of satisfied customers who have already recommended us to their friends.

Why not follow their example and place your order today? Choose Our Professionals to Complete Your Writing Tasks! If your deadline is just around the corner and you have tons of coursework piling up, contact us and we will ease your academic burden. We are ready to develop unique papers according to your requirements, no matter how strict they are. Our experts create writing masterpieces that earn our customers not only high grades but also a solid reputation from demanding professors. Don't waste your time and order our essay writing service today!

Gay Marriage and the Limits Of Consequentialism. Ross Douthat does a very fair job of summarizing the Regnerus study on outcomes of gay parenting, and how that study can plausibly be used as the basis for arguments either for or against gay marriage. And I am inclined to agree that the consequentialist case for gay marriage – that it will change gay culture for the better, that it will strengthen marriage as an institution, etc.

The precautionary principle, if taken really seriously, is an argument for never doing anything. Social science is never going to be able to tell us enough to confidently endorse changing social arrangements. When Zhou Enlai was asked what he thought was the significance of the French Revolution, he answered, “it’s too soon to say.” That’s surely the right answer to any question about what the impact of gay marriage might be – and will probably be the right answer forever, if only because of the extraordinary number of confounding variables. My own instinct is that, yes, growing up with same- sex parents poses some interesting psychological challenges.

If you are a boy raised by two women, for example, you may need to look elsewhere to find a male figure to identify with. But plenty of straight fathers do a lousy job of role- modeling.

Moreover, there are innumerable other circumstances that pose unique psychological challenges, more obviously serious than being raised by a same- sex couple: being raised by an elderly father who dies during your adolescence (I have several adult friends who lost parents in adolescence; all of them were shaped profoundly and permanently by the loss); being raised by young parents whose marriage does not survive the inevitable strains (my parents married right out of college, and split when I was seven); or being raised by people who are not your biological parents at all (I am an adoptive father). We do not have a great national debate about whether to prevent older men from marrying younger women, or whether to prevent further encourage delaying marriage (rather than opposite – social conservatives fret that we are marrying too late on average), or whether to curtail adoption (though there are dissenters, the overwhelming consensus on left and right is in favor of adoption as a humane response to the great number of children in need of stable homes). What’s special about gay couples that requires them to clear the bar of ideality? The law is not designed to make sure that every child is raised in an ideal home, nor even to make sure that our homes steadily approach some asymptotic ideal. The law is designed to protect children from situations of abuse and neglect, and otherwise to preserve the peace and to facilitate the social arrangements that the citizenry finds natural and sensible. It is the citizenry, acting through its representatives, that should decide what is natural and sensible, which is why I feel the legislatures of the several states are the right venues for deliberating this question, but the point is: the deliberation isn’t really about social science theory, but about sociological reality.

The case for gay marriage – the Burkean case, you might say – is simply that what amount to common- law gay marriages already exist. Numerous gay couples settle down for long- term, even life- long relationships of mutual support. They jointly own property. They bear, adopt, and rear children. These are already existing realities, not hypotheticals. They are not the product of state diktats; they are the product of organic cultural change which, in turn, has shaped changes in the law.

The question before the people is whether to recognize these realities, and, if so, as what. And it’s the answer that seems to be getting intuitively more persuasive to more and more people as they look at these couples and at straight marriages and don’t see any fundamental differences that the law should be cognizant of.